MAGA lied
MAGAlied.com — The Documented Record
“Under the Trump economic plan, we will cut your energy prices in half… Mark it down, and you can get very angry at me if we don’t do it.”
Donald Trump · Wilmington, NC · September 21, 2024 · on video
We marked it down. They didn’t do it.
The record

Their words. Their documents. Side by side.

Every entry on this site leads with an internal contradiction — the administration’s own statements or its own data contradicting its stated rationale. You don’t have to trust any news outlet to check us. You have to read two quotes.

“I’ll end the Ukraine war in 24 hours”

PROMISED 53+ TIMES, 2023–2024 · RETRACTED MARCH 2025

WHAT THEY SAID

I will have it solved within one day, a peace between them. — repeated, in a serious tone, at least 53 times on the campaign trail.

WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS

Well, I was being a little bit sarcastic when I said that. — Trump, on camera, 54 days into the term. Later: the promise was “figurative,” “an exaggeration,” “said in jest.”

The Epstein files: “made up by Obama” — then he signed the bill to release them

JULY 2025 – NOVEMBER 2025

WHAT THEY SAID

These files were made up by Comey. They were made up by Obama. They were made up by Biden. — July 15, 2025.

WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS

His own post, three days earlier: If there was ANYTHING in there that could have hurt the MAGA Movement, why didn’t they use it? The investigations ran 2006–2008 and 2019 — under Bush and Trump. In November, he signed the bill ordering the files released.

“The worst of the worst”

CONTRADICTED BY ICE’S OWN DATA, NOV.–DEC. 2025

WHAT THEY SAID

Immigration enforcement is arresting the worst of the worst — violent criminals. Asked on 60 Minutes: That’s what we’re doing.

WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS

ICE’s own booking data: 73% of people taken into custody had no criminal conviction . 5% had a violent conviction. Analysis by the Cato Institute — a libertarian think tank — from leaked ICE records.
Our congressman, on the record

Bill Huizenga voted for it. Then he told you it was a win.

The pattern isn’t only in Washington press conferences. It’s in how Michigan’s 4th District is represented — and it’s checkable in the Congressional Record and the roll-call votes.

“A massive win for hardworking Americans”

HIS VOTE FOR THE “ONE BIG BEAUTIFUL BILL,” 2025

WHAT HE SAID

A massive win for hardworking Americans. — Rep. Bill Huizenga, on his vote, after local health officials warned the Medicaid cuts could overwhelm rural hospitals.

WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS

In his own district, per Michigan officials: at least 15,000 Medicaid enrollees at risk of losing coverage, and about 47,200 marketplace enrollees facing premium increases over $700 a year.

“An imminent and growing threat”

HOUSE FLOOR, MARCH 4, 2026 · CONGRESSIONAL RECORD

WHAT HE SAID

Operation Epic Fury is a defensive action using overwhelming force to protect the American people from an imminent and growing threat. The next day he voted against the War Powers resolution to end the unauthorized war.

WHAT THE RECORD SHOWS

Trump had spent the previous eight months saying Iran’s nuclear program was obliterated. A 2025 federal assessment found Iran years away from missiles that could reach the U.S. Both can’t be true — and Huizenga repeated the version that justified the war.

This site documents the record. The campaign to change it is already underway — billboards, organizing, and a full accounting of fifteen years of votes.

Learn more about crooked Bill and see what we’re doing to stop him at mi4thdems.org →
Felt in Southwest Michigan
“You either import the people or you import the products.”
A Southwest Michigan farmer, on the labor his orchards depend on — Rural Innovation Exchange, Sept. 2025

The promises were national. The bills arrive here: the electricity that was supposed to cost half, the groceries that were supposed to come down on Day One, the farm labor the Department of Labor says our food system runs on, the rural hospitals that treat everyone. This section follows the record from the podium to the kitchen table.

Methodology

How this site works — and how to check us

  1. Who we are, plainly. This site is published by Michigan’s Fourth District Democrats. Our goal is not a secret: we want to flip Michigan’s 4th Congressional District and retire Bill Huizenga. We are not neutral about who should win elections, and we don’t pretend to be. What we claim to be is accurate — and everything here is built so you can verify that without trusting us.
  2. Internal contradictions first. Every entry leads with the administration’s own words, its own agencies’ data, or its own published documents contradicting its stated rationale. Where an outside source is load-bearing, we prefer primary documents (court records, the Congressional Record, agency filings, corporate disclosures) and named reporters over outlet brands.
  3. Every claim is tagged. DOCUMENTED means quote, record, or data you can check at the link. INFERENCE means a conclusion we drew — labeled so you can weigh it. PROJECTION means a model-based estimate, always given as a range with its method. If a claim can’t earn a tag, it doesn’t ship.
  4. We publish what’s true even when it cuts against us. Entries state what the administration got right — the parts of a strike that succeeded, the provision in a bill that genuinely helps ratepayers — because a record that hides inconvenient facts isn’t a record. The lie is usually the totality, not the direction, and we say which.
  5. On “both sides.” Fact-checkers flag false statements across the political spectrum, including by Democrats, and we link the same fact-checkers we cite. This site documents something narrower and more specific: a sustained pattern of consequential false statements by one administration and its allies, established in their own words. If you believe an entry fails that test, use the corrections address below.
  6. Corrections, dated and visible. If we get something wrong, we correct it with a dated note at the top of the entry. We never silently edit. Corrections: corrections@magalied.com [SET UP THIS INBOX BEFORE LAUNCH]
  7. Nothing here is anonymous sourcing of ours. Where reporting we cite relies on unnamed officials (for example, descriptions of classified assessments), we attribute that explicitly to the outlet that carried it and say so in the entry.

Entries include the date each source was last verified. Dead links are repaired or the claim is retagged. This site does not use tracking beyond basic page counts, and it will never ask you for money to read the record.


Posted

in

by

Tags: